Call of Duty: World at War is better than Call of Duty 4 | Dude11356's Comparison | MyFellowGamers | Community-driven comparative video game reviews and rankings

Call of Duty 4
-vs-
Call of Duty: World at War

Write a comparison!

Call of Duty: World at War Call of Duty 4

Overall Comparison

A very tough choice, but I had to go with World at War mostly because of some more challenging missions. I liked Nazi Zombies too. World at war also has some slightly better graphics and more realistic gameplay. Its also has co-op which is a cool experience to be fighting alongside a friend thorugh WWII.

6/26/2009 2:06 am

4 4 7

Comments

Rifles were TERRIBLY underpowered, so I hated W&W because I used to LOVE rifles in the old WWII games.

ubiquitous
ubiquitous Level 7

reply

6/26/2009 3:06 am
- I've always liked the feeling of firing one shot at a time as opposed to full auto fire. Something just feels different when you fire each shot on your own. Heck, whenever I play Ghost Squad in the arcades, I always pick the magnum so that I fire a single shot at a time.
  
  justin
  justin Level 29
  
  reply
  
  6/26/2009 11:06 am
  - Did you ever play Rainbow Six: Vegas? The Magnum in that game was incredible... But yeah, I do the same, everytime I pick up a modern 'realistic' FPS I instantly put my rifle on single fire - suppressed. It just feels so much better, whereas, if you do that in COD:W&W you'll just get gunned from behind by a semi-auto.
    
    ubiquitous
    ubiquitous Level 7
    
    reply
    
    6/28/2009 7:06 pm
    
    Never played Rainbow Six: Vegas, but I always intended on playing it. Does that count? =P
    
    justin
    justin Level 29
    
    reply
    
    6/29/2009 10:06 am
While I love the strange Nazi Zombies mode, I have a hard time of figuring out why WaW exists. For one, I'm tired of WWII shooters (who isn't?). And it didn't really seem like it added anything new to the series.

Modern Warfare was amazing. The stealthy sniper level will always be one of my favorites. And a thermal gunner on a gunship was a treat. But in WaW, I'm just driving a tank and shooting the same obsolete ballistics again.

Stone
Stone Level 26

reply

6/29/2009 3:06 pm
- I haven't played WAW and I don't think I ever will. ww2 games are fun because of the history behind them but one good one is enough for me. and that good one was cod2. and it still is cod2.
  
  GeneBit
  GeneBit Level 23
  
  reply
  
  6/29/2009 10:06 pm
The WW2 setting have already been played in CoD2. I feel like WatW is an expansion with MW elements. During my time beta testing it, I was disappointed.

dnode
dnode Level 3

reply

9/8/2009 10:09 pm